Category Archives: issues

Alternative to Keystone XL

Update: It turns out the risk assessment on which I’ve based my thinking leaves out pump stations, opening an important question about the legitimacy of the method that produced the numbers I’ve cited below and on many other occasions. It … Continue reading

Posted in Keystone pipeline | Tagged , , | Comments Off

EID responds to NRDC; I waited eleven months for this?

EID finally got around to answering NRDC’s list of possible hydraulic fracturing incidents. I’ve griped about the delay before: The one obvious agreement between environmentalists and industry is that there are more anecdotes of possible fracking catastrophes than EID wants … Continue reading

Posted in hydraulic fracturing | Tagged , | Comments Off

Two links

1) Agriculture by the numbers is a post by High Country News that explores some of the most recent Census of Agriculture numbers. The numbers date to 2007, but may be useful for grounding wonkish observations like “The 2007 percentage … Continue reading

Posted in energy, interests | Comments Off

Another strong statement of the narrow argument against KXL

From a letter to the Lufkin Daily News: Your op-ed reads that pipelines are safe. Typically, sure. But you forget to make an important distinction, here. Tar sands oil pipelines are not safe. Canadian pipelines of this sort fail 16 … Continue reading

Posted in Keystone pipeline | Tagged , , | Comments Off

Meta-tastic: the spreading reaction to NYT’s Keystone XL editorial

I’m collecting links to organized media’s reactions to the NYT editorial as I see them. If I’m missing something, let me know at andrewottosonblog@gmail.com. (Those in bold analyzed; italics added value; plain regurgitated.) MEDIA: Postmedia/Sheldon Alberts: Keystone XL pipeline proposal … Continue reading

Posted in Keystone pipeline | Tagged , , | Comments Off

NYT makes the narrow case against Keystone XL

In its April 2 editorial, the New York Times unites a broad case against tar sands development with a narrow case against the proposed Keystone XL pipeline project. In doing so, it exposes the absence of a credible argument in … Continue reading

Posted in Keystone pipeline | Tagged , , | Comments Off

Smartest take on Gasland so far

Here’s the article. Here’s the quote: The state of Pennsylvania is the latest member of the shale gas coalition to fail to grasp the industry’s possibly crippling PR malady. … Shale gas skeptics have created a widely accepted narrative that … Continue reading

Posted in energy, environment | Comments Off

What I’m reading

Two series on energy issues. [1, 2] One long article on how oft-promised job creation falls short. The first is a set on hydraulic fracturing produced by the Denton Record-Chronicle, a newspaper with a circulation of 15,000 daily and 38,500 … Continue reading

Posted in energy | Comments Off

Will President Obama mention Keystone XL in energy speech today?

(Update: Financial Post’s take. I’m with @JoshatNRDC on this one.) The headline question is the first thing I wondered upon seeing the news that Obama will reiterate what has been a national goal going on four decades: to cut oil … Continue reading

Posted in Keystone pipeline | Tagged , , | Comments Off

Keystone pipeline news and notes 9

The big news in #8 was the State Department’s decision to require a supplemental draft EIS. I’ll be updating this post with the latest at the bottom. You can contact me at andrewottosonblog@gmail.com. A week Canadian energy became supreme – … Continue reading

Posted in Keystone pipeline | Tagged , , | Comments Off